For Web3 founders, DAOs and token projects

Web3 setup — tokens, DAOs, NFTs.

Q: Do I need a VASP licence to issue a token?

It depends on the jurisdiction. A pure initial token sale by a non-resident issuer in BVI does not currently trigger VASP licensing. In the UAE, VARA 'VA Issuance' is a licensable activity; ADGM FSRA moved to a notification regime in 2025. Most well-structured token launches keep the issuer in a jurisdiction where issuance alone is not licensed and run regulated activities through separately licensed vehicles.

Q: Where do exchanges actually want to see my issuer registered?

Tier 1 exchanges maintain internal acceptance lists. Cayman, BVI, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Singapore and ADGM appear on every acceptance list we have seen. Marshall Islands and Wyoming DAO LLCs are increasingly accepted for DAO-governed tokens. Some exchanges will not list tokens issued from Delaware, US generally, China or sanctioned jurisdictions.

Q: Can the founders be UAE residents while the issuer is in Cayman / BVI?

Yes — this is the most common pattern. Founders hold UAE residency through a UAE Free Zone operating subsidiary, drawing salary and consultancy fees from the offshore issuer at arm's length. The UAE residency unlocks the 0% personal income tax position; the offshore issuer holds the token treasury and protocol IP.

Cayman Foundation + BVI Issuer for token launches. Marshall Islands or Wyoming for DAOs. UAE VARA, ADGM and DIFC for regulated activity. We file the structures we recommend, and we recommend the ones we have taken to listing.

Why Web3 needs different jurisdictions to traditional companies

Token issuance, DAO governance, NFT projects and Web3 protocols sit at the intersection of corporate law, securities law, AML/CTF regulation and emerging crypto-specific frameworks. The legal-entity choices that work for a SaaS company (Delaware C-Corp, UAE Free Zone, Singapore Pte Ltd) often fail for a Web3 project — because token issuance triggers securities laws, DAOs need wrappers that recognise on-chain governance, and exchanges and banks demand a specific list of pre-vetted jurisdictions before they will list or onboard.

ArxSetup's Web3 practice is led by ArxSetup (Australian-qualified blockchain and crypto lawyer, listed in Crypto News Australia's leading crypto-lawyer roster) and ArxSetup (Special Counsel — Corporate & Web3; founded her own NFT project in 2021). We file the structures we recommend, and we recommend the structures we have personally taken to listing.

The three structures we use most

For token launches

Cayman Foundation + BVI Issuer

The industry-standard token-issuance structure. Foundation governs; BVI sells tokens. Tax-neutral, exchange-acceptable.

For DAOs

DAO LLC (Marshall Islands / Wyoming)

Recognises on-chain governance directly. Member liability shield without traditional director roles.

For NFT projects

UAE Free Zone + Cayman SPC

Operating company in IFZA or DMCC; IP and royalties held by Cayman SPC with per-collection segregation.

UAE crypto regimes — three different regulators

The UAE has three Web3-relevant regulators sitting in three different free zones, plus VARA for Dubai mainland. They are not interchangeable.

VARA (Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority — Dubai) — the Dubai mainland virtual-assets regulator. Licenses VA Advisory, Broker-Dealer, Custody, Exchange, Lending, Management, and VA Issuance. Most appropriate for businesses physically operating from Dubai mainland and serving UAE retail.
ADGM FSRA (Abu Dhabi) — the original UAE crypto framework (since 2018). English common-law jurisdiction; FSRA shifted issuance to a notification regime in June 2025. Strongest for institutional Web3 (funds, market makers, custodians).
DIFC DFSA (Dubai International Financial Centre) — focused on tokenised investments, Investment Tokens, and crypto fund managers. Highest barrier to entry; appropriate for regulated-product issuance.

See our VARA vs ADGM vs DIFC comparison for which regulator to pick for what.

Token-issuance jurisdictions ranked

The decision of where to issue a token is rarely about tax — every credible token-issuance jurisdiction is effectively 0% on the issuance event. The decision is driven by (1) exchange listing acceptance, (2) banking access, (3) regulatory clarity around your specific token type (utility, security, payment, NFT), and (4) where your team is and can be tax-resident. Our full ranking is in the Token Issuance Jurisdiction Guide.

Web3 guides

Common Web3 questions

Do I need a VASP licence to issue a token?

It depends on the jurisdiction and what you are doing alongside the issuance. A pure initial token sale by a non-resident issuer in BVI does not currently trigger VASP licensing. In the UAE, VARA "VA Issuance" is a licensable activity; ADGM FSRA moved to a notification regime in 2025. Most well-structured token launches keep the issuer in a jurisdiction where issuance alone is not licensed and run regulated activities (exchange, custody, advisory) through separately licensed vehicles.

Where do exchanges actually want to see my issuer registered?

The Tier 1 exchanges (Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, OKX) maintain internal acceptance lists. Cayman, BVI, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Singapore and ADGM appear on every acceptance list we have seen. Marshall Islands and Wyoming DAO LLCs are increasingly accepted for DAO-governed tokens. Some exchanges will not list tokens issued from Delaware, US generally, China, or sanctioned jurisdictions.

Can the founders be UAE residents while the issuer is in Cayman / BVI?

Yes — this is the most common pattern we file. Founders hold UAE residency through a UAE Free Zone operating subsidiary (typically IFZA or ADGM), drawing salary and consultancy fees from the offshore issuer at arm's length. The UAE residency unlocks the 0% personal income tax position; the offshore issuer holds the token treasury and protocol IP.

Request a structure call All guides